A Flowchart for drug screening in c-myb^hyper transgenic zebrafish. For preliminary screening, 96-well plates were used and each well was placed 5 embryos to detect potential effective drugs. For secondary screening, 12-well plates were used and each well was placed more embryos (n?>?15) to further verify the potential effective drugs screened from the preliminary screening. B Natural estrogens decreased SB positive cells in the CHT region in c-myb^hyper transgenic zebrafish. Many pairs of zebrafish parents were selected for the drugs treatment, the embryos from each parent pair were randomly divided into two groups, one for a compound treated group and the other for its control (DMSO group). (t-test, ***p?<?0.001, **p?<?0.01. n?>?15.) C Progesterone had no effect on SB positive cells in the CHT region in c-myb^hyper transgenic zebrafish. (t-test, ns, no significance. n?>?15).

A E2 exposure decreased SB positive cells in the CHT region. (t-test, ***p?<?0.001, **p?<?0.01. n?>?20). B E2 exposure decreased lyz in the CHT region, as determined by WISH. (t-test, ***p?<?0.001, **p?<?0.01. n?>?20). C The qPCR quantification of the decrease in lyz expression with E2 (t-test, mean?±?SEM; ***p?<?0.001, **p?<?0.01. n???10). D May-Grunwald-Giemsa staining of whole KM blood cells in 6-month-old c-myb^hyper animals followed by four days of E2 treatment (t-test, ***p?<?0.001. n?=?12). Red arrowheads, blue asterisks, black arrowheads and yellow lightning indicate neutrophils, precursors, lymphocytes and macrophages, respectively. E Double staining of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)/Lcp indicated decreased neutrophil proliferation in c-myb^hyper zebrafish embryos treated with E2. (one-way ANOVA (LSD) ***p?<?0.001, n?=?12). F The TUNEL assays showed the effect of E2 on the apoptosis of myeloid lineage in zebrafish embryos (one-way ANOVA (LSD) ***p?<?0.001, ns, no significance. n?=?12).

A?D Knockdown of esr1 (A), esr2a (B), esr2b (C) and gper1 (D) did not alleviate E2-mediated inhibition of c-myb^hyper zebrafish neutrophils. (one-way ANOVA (LSD) ***p?<?0.001, **p?<?0.01, *p?<?0.05. ns, no significance, n?>?15). E PPT, DPN and G1 had no effect on c-myb^hyper zebrafish neutrophils. (one-way ANOVA (LSD), ns, no significance, n?>?20). F Knockdown of esr1, esr2a and esr2b simultaneously did not alleviate E2-mediated inhibition of c-myb^hyper zebrafish neutrophils. (one-way ANOVA (LSD) ***p?<?0.001, **p?<?0.01, ns, no significance, n?>?15). G ICI 182780 did not alleviate E2-mediated inhibition of c-myb^hyper zebrafish neutrophils. (one-way ANOVA (LSD) ***p?<?0.001, ns, no significance, n?>?15). H Knockdown of esr1, esr2a esr2b and gper1 simultaneously did not alleviate E2-mediated inhibition of c-myb^hyper zebrafish neutrophils (one-way ANOVA (LSD) ***p?<?0.001, **p?<?0.01, ns, no significance, n?>?15). I The triple esr1; esr2a; esr2b receptor mutant (esr^-/-) was produced through mating to knock out all three classical nuclear receptors. SB staining showed that the E2-induced neutrophil decrease was also not alleviated in the triple mutant. (t-test, mean?±?SEM; ***p?<?0.001, *p?<?0.05. ns, no significance. n?>?10).

A E2 exposure decreased c-myb in the CHT, as determined by WISH. B qPCR quantification of the decreased c-myb expression by E2 (the c-myb^hyper fusion gene contained two parts, which comprised truncated c-myb from exon1 to exon10, followed by a near full-length c-myb from exon2 to exon 15). c-myb-primer1 and c-myb-primer2 were designed at repetitive and nonrepetitive sequences. (t-test, mean?±?SEM. ***p?<?0.001, **p?<?0.01, n?>?10). C qPCR quantification of decreased c-myb expression in c-myb^hyper adult zebrafish kidney after treatment with E2. (t-test, mean?±?SEM. ^***p?<?0.001, ^*p?<?0.05, n?>?10) (D) FACS analysis confirmed that E2 diminished c-myb:GFP⁺ cells. (t-test, mean?±?SEM. ^*p?<?0.05, n?>?10) (E) qPCR quantification of decreased c-myb expression in c-myb:GFP⁺ cells by E2. (t-test, mean?±?SEM. ***p?<?0.001, n?>?10). F qPCR quantification of decreased c-myb expression in lyz:Dsred⁺ cells by E2. (t-test, mean?±?SEM. ***p?<?0.001, **p?<?0.01, n?>?10).

A Double staining of hif1? and c-myb-GFP with antibodies with or without E2 treatment. B Knockdown (MO) or inhibition (PX-478) of hif1? decreased c-myb and lyz expression by WISH as well as SB positive neutrophils in c-myb^hyper zebrafish. (t-test, ***p?<?0.001, **p?<?0.01, *p?<?0.05, n?>?20). C Overexpression of hif1? reversed E2 induced down-regulation of c-myb and lyz expression by WISH and neutrophil hyperplasia by SB staining. (t-test, ***p?<?0.001, **p?<?0.01, *p?<?0.05, n?>?20).

A E2 decreased neutrophils in AB zebrafish embryos. (t-test, ***p?<?0.001, n?>?20). B May?Grunwald?Giemsa staining of whole KM blood cells in 6-month-old AB zebrafish after 4 days of E2 treatment (t-test, ***p?<?0.001, n?=?12). Red arrowheads, blue asterisks, black arrowheads and yellow lightning indicates neutrophils, precursors, lymphocytes and macrophages, respectively. C Staining of hif1? with antibody with or without E2 treatment. D E2 exposure decreased c-myb in the CHT, as determined by WISH. E qPCR quantification of decreased c-myb expression in lyz:Dsred⁺ cells by E2 (t-test, mean?±?SEM. ***p?<?0.001, **p?<?0.01, ^*p?<?0.05, n?>?20). F Effect of E2 on neutrophil proliferation in AB zebrafish embryos. (one-way ANOVA (LSD). ns, no significance, n?>?10). G E2 promotes the apoptosis of myeloid lineage cells in AB zebrafish embryos (one-way ANOVA (LSD) **p?<?0.01. n?>?10).

Schematic illustration of the neutrophil hyperplasia inhibiting role of E2 in zebrafish MDS E2 reverts neutrophil hyperplasia by regulating the proliferation and apoptosis of neutrophils through inhibition of the hif1?-c-myb pathway in zebrafish MDS models.