Fig. 5

Liver regeneration in the mutants. a–c Regenerated liver in the control (a) and hspd1^la026911 mutant (b), and the quantification of the liver areas (c). d–f Regenerated liver in the control (d) and hspe1^hg77 mutant (e), and the quantification of the liver areas (f). g–i Regenerated liver in the control (g) and hspa13^hg78 mutant (h), and the quantification of the liver areas (i). j–l Regenerated liver in the control (j) and rnpc3^la028632 mutant (k), and the quantification of the liver areas (l). m–o Regenerated liver in the control (m) and smn1^fh299 mutant (n), and the quantification of the liver areas (o). p–r Regenerated liver in the control (p) and gemin5^hg80 mutant (q), and the quantification of the liver areas (r). Graphs are generated from analysis of approximately 45 CFP-positive embryos obtained by crossing one fish carrying heterozygous gene mutation with the other fish carrying heterozygous mutation and an allele of Tg(fabp10:CFP-NTR). Error bars show the s.e.m. Control (Ctrl) represents both wild-type and heterozygotes, as there was no difference observed between them. A significant difference was observed between the wild-type and the mutant for all the mutations (p < 0.05 for all)