FIGURE

Figure 3

ID
ZDB-FIG-211014-11
Publication
Tao et al., 2021 - CHAF1A Blocks Neuronal Differentiation and Promotes Neuroblastoma Oncogenesis via Metabolic Reprogramming
Other Figures
All Figure Page
Back to All Figure Page
Figure 3

CHAF1A blocks NC differentiation. a) Schematic presentation of early NCC events during zebrafish development. hpf = hours post fertilization. b) Spatial‐temporal expression of sox9b, crestin, and chaf1a in 16 hpf and 24 hpf embryos by hybridization chain reaction (HCR). A (anterior), P (posterior), D (dorsal), and V (ventral) axes shown in upper left corner. c) Spatial‐temporal expression of chaf1a and mycn in 16 hpf and 24 hpf embryos by HCR. d) Top: tSNE plots with relative expression levels of chaf1a and mycn in NCC and NCC derivatives at 48–50 hpf (red = chaf1a, blue = mycn, magenta = both). Bottom: HCR against chaf1a and mycn in 48 hpf embryos. Arrowheads: populations co‐expressing chaf1a and mycn. e) Top: tSNE plots with relative expression of chaf1a and elavl3 in NCC and NCC‐derivatives at 48–50 hpf and at 68–70 hpf (red = chaf1a, blue = elavl3, magenta = both). Bottom: HCR against chaf1a and elavl3 in 48 hpf and 70 hpf embryos. White arrowheads: developing cranial ganglia (elavl3+); red arrowheads: surrounding non‐neuronal tissue (chaf1a+). f) Top: tSNE plots with relative expression of mycn and elavl3 in NCC and NCC‐derivatives at 68–70 hpf (red = mycn, blue = elavl3, magenta = both). Bottom: HCR against mycn and elavl3 in 70 hpf embryos. White arrowheads: developing cranial ganglia (elavl3+). g) Diagram for ectopic expression of human CHAF1A in zebrafish NCCs. h) Percentage of GFP+/mCherry+ or GFP+/CHAF1A+ clones that also express Elavl3. i) Representative image from a sox10: mCherry‐IRES‐EGFP and a sox10:CHAF1A‐IRES‐EGFP injected embryo. Markers: EGFP (green), gene of interest (GOI) either mCherry or CHAF1A (red), and Elavl3 (cyan). White arrowheads: GFP+/GOI+, GFP+/mCherry+, or GFP+/CHAF1A+ clones; tan arrowheads: GFP+/GOI+/Elavl3+ clones. j) CHAF1A expression in neurons versus NCCs in a hESCs‐derived NCC induction and differentiation model. Left: schematic representation of the hNC model. Middle: TFAP2A and TUJ1 immunofluorescence staining in NCCs and neurons, respectively. Right: qPCR analysis of NCC markers (SOX9 and TFAP2A) and neuron markers (TUBB3, which encodes TUJ1, and MAPT) in NCCs and neurons. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 2); two‐sided unpaired t‐test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. k) Left: schematic representation of NCC induction and RA‐induced differentiation into mature neurons with or without CHAF1A overexpression. Middle: immunofluorescence staining of TUJ1 with or without CHAF1A overexpression. Right: percentages of TUJ1 positive cells are quantified with Image J2. Mean ± SD (n = 6); two‐sided unpaired t‐test, ****p < 0.0001. Scale bars = 100 µm in (a–f), (j), (k), and uncropped images in (i); Scale bars = 25 µm for cropped images in (i). y = yolk sac, e = developing eye, b = developing brain, sc = developing spinal cord.

Expression Data
Genes:
Fish:
Anatomical Terms:
Stage Range: 14-19 somites to Pec-fin

Expression Detail
Antibody Labeling
Phenotype Data

Phenotype Detail
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Adv Sci (Weinh)