FIGURE

Fig. 1

ID
ZDB-FIG-221221-23
Publication
Lee et al., 2021 - Optimised tissue clearing minimises distortion and destruction during tissue delipidation
Other Figures
All Figure Page
Back to All Figure Page
Fig. 1

Tissue clearing with different concentrations of SDS vs SDS‐OPTIClear. (A) Representative images of 4 mm‐thick rat brain tissues before and after clearing with SDS and SDS‐OPTIClear respectively. Scale bar = 5 mm. (B) Absorbance at 750 nm for tissues cleared at varying concentrations of SDS vs SDS‐OPTIClear (n = 5–6). Lower absorbance level indicates higher transparency level. (C) Fold of area change after clearing with SDS compared to SDS‐OPTIClear (n = 3). Tissue sizes were quantified and normalised to the size of tissue before clearing. (D) Fold of protein loss after clearing for SDS only compared to SDS‐OPTIClear (n = 5–6). Solutions used for clearing were collected and then added to a stain‐free gel for electrophoresis, band intensities were quantified and normalised with the protein band intensity of sample solution collected at day 0 (before clearing). Mean ± SEM for all graphs. Two‐way ANOVA, Tukey's multiple comparison test, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001

Expression Data

Expression Detail
Antibody Labeling
Phenotype Data

Phenotype Detail
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol.