FIGURE

Fig. 1

ID
ZDB-FIG-231215-73
Publication
Thompson et al., 2020 - Identification and requirements of enhancers that direct gene expression during zebrafish fin regeneration
Other Figures
All Figure Page
Back to All Figure Page
Fig. 1

Chromatin accessibility profiling of regenerating zebrafish fins. (A) By 4 dpa, the fin regeneration blastema is formed, and proliferating fibroblasts and osteoblasts actively restore lost mesenchymal tissue, extracellular matrix and bone. Zebrafish are able to fully regenerate their fins by 2-3 weeks after injury. (B) Immediately following fin ray amputation, epidermal cells migrate to cover the site of injury and signal to the underlying mesenchyme, which forms a regeneration blastema. The blastema is formed by 2 dpa, and osteoblasts align at the basal epidermal layer and begin to deposit matrix by 3-4 dpa. (C) Overview of sample collection and enzymatic dissociation for ATAC-seq and RNA-seq profiling of 0 dpa, 1 dpa and 4 dpa fin tissue. Uninjured samples were collected from ∼1.5 mm portions of tissue from the middle region of fins, while regenerating samples were collected at 1 or 4 dpa from the regenerating tissue and one joint proximal to the amputation plane. Each sample contained 15 pooled fin clips. (D) Dot plot of differential ATAC-seq chromatin regions linked to nearby differential transcripts in 4 dpa versus 0 dpa whole-fin samples. Each point indicates a separate ATAC-seq peak. (E) Heat map of increased transcripts in 4 dpa versus 0 dpa regenerating whole-fin tissue linked to nearby differentially accessible chromatin regions. Uninjured 0 dpa samples for both 4 dpa and 1 dpa datasets were used to consider batch effects when performing differential comparison. (F) Dot plot of differential ATAC-seq chromatin regions linked to nearby differential transcripts in 1 dpa versus 0 dpa whole-fin samples. Each point indicates a separate ATAC-seq peak. (G) Heat map of upregulated transcripts in 1 dpa versus 0 dpa regenerating whole-fin tissue linked to nearby differentially accessible chromatin regions. Uninjured 0 dpa samples for both 4 dpa and 1 dpa datasets were used to consider batch effects when performing differential comparison. (H) Venn diagram comparison of differentially expressed genes in 0 versus 1 dpa compared with 0 versus 4 dpa RNA-seq data. Many of the transcripts that are differential at 4 dpa from 0 dpa are also differential at 1 dpa. (I,J) Browser tracks of TREEs near fgf20a, fgf20aE48 (I) and mdka, mdkaE20 (J). Both genes increase transcript levels during regeneration. Tracks represent normalized combined replicates.

Expression Data

Expression Detail
Antibody Labeling
Phenotype Data

Phenotype Detail
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Development