FIGURE

Fig. 8

ID
ZDB-FIG-220627-34
Publication
Della Vecchia et al., 2022 - Trehalose Treatment in Zebrafish Model of Lafora Disease
Other Figures
All Figure Page
Back to All Figure Page
Fig. 8

Locomotor, LFP and burst activity recordings after trehalose administration. (A) Locomotion analysis at five dpf in controls (WT) treated (n = 172) and untreated with trehalose (n = 193) and in epm2a−/− mutant larvae treated (n = 213) and untreated with trehalose (n = 228). Statistical analysis (**** p ≤ 0.0001) was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Dunn’s test was used to perform post-hoc analysis for multiple comparisons after the Kruskal-Wallis test. (B) Tail flick analysis performed at 30 hpf in controls (WT) treated (n = 91) and untreated with trehalose (n = 87) as well as in epm2a−/− mutant larvae treated (n = 106) and untreated with trehalose (n = 111). Statistical analysis (**** p ≤ 0.0001) was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Dunn’s test was used to perform post-hoc analysis for multiple comparisons after the Kruskal-Wallis test. ns, not significant (C) Violin plot of the effect of trehalose on the power and duration of detected events, 11 larvae per group were analyzed at five dpf. Statistical analysis (**** p ≤ 0.0001) was performed using the Mann-Whitney test.

Expression Data

Expression Detail
Antibody Labeling
Phenotype Data
Fish:
Condition:
Observed In:
Stage Range: Prim-15 to Day 5

Phenotype Detail
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Int. J. Mol. Sci.