IMAGE

Fig. 4

ID
ZDB-IMAGE-221109-19
Source
Figures for Chrystal et al., 2022
Image
Figure Caption

Fig. 4

C. elegans CFAP20 and PACRG perform non-redundant roles in cilium-dependent behaviours and development: gustatory plasticity, lifespan control, locomotion, and body size.

a C. elegans cfap-20 and pcrg-1 single and double mutants show defects in gustatory plasticity. Wild-type animals pre-exposed to a high NaCl concentration (100 mM) display a reduced attraction to NaCl in chemotaxis assays involving 0 mM and 25 mM NaCl quadrant plates. After exposure to high-NaCl conditions, cfap-20 and pcrg-1 single and double mutants still have significantly increased attraction to NaCl compared to wild-type (one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test P values: WT vs cfap-20 = 0.005; WT vs. pcrg-1 = 0.0001; WT vs cfap-20;pcrg-1 = 0.006; cfap-20 vs pcrg-1 = 0.9999; cfap-20 vs cfap-20;pcrg-1 = 0.9999; pcrg-1 vs cfap-20;pcrg-1 = 0.9318). b C. elegans cfap-20 and pcrg-1 single and double mutants have reduced lifespans. Staged animals are cultured on plates at 20 °C and monitored every 1–2 days for signs of life. Animals with impaired intraflagellar transport and/or prominent cilia structure defects, such as the che-11 control mutant shown, exhibit an enhanced lifespan. The cfap-20 single and double mutants (with pcrg-1) undergo a statistically-significant reduction in longevity (Log rank Mantle-Cox test; P values: WT vs cfap-20 = 0.0001; WT vs pcrg-1 = 0.0001; WT vs cfap-20;pcrg-1 = 0.0001; WT vs che-11 = 0.0001; cfap-20 vs pcrg-1 = 0.0001; cfap-20 vs cfap-20;pcrg-1 = 0.0755; cfap-20 vs che-11 = 0.0001; pcrg-1 vs cfap-20;pcrg-1 = 0.0024; pcrg-1 vs che-11 = 0.0001; cfap-20;pcrg-1 vs che-11 = 0.0001). c C. elegans cfap-20 and pcrg-1 single and double mutants exhibit a reduced locomotion (roaming defect) common in cilia mutants. The tracks of individual animals are scored with the help of a grid after 24 h. The che-11 mutant, which has IFT defects and major cilia structure anomalies, is shown together with wild-type as a control (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test; P values: WT vs cfap-20 = 0.0066; WT vs pcrg-1 = 0.0005; WT vs cfap-20;pcrg-1 = 0.0001; WT vs che-11 = 0.0001; cfap-20 vs pcrg-1 = 0.9426; cfap-20 vs cfap-20;pcrg-1 = 0.0532; cfap-20 vs che-11 = 0.0001; pcrg-1 vs cfap-20;pcrg-1 = 0.2742; pcrg-1 vs che-11 = 0.0001; cfap-20;pcrg-1 vs che-11 = 0.0001). d C. elegans cfap-20 and pcrg-1 single and double mutants have small body sizes (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test; P values: WT vs cfap-20 = 0.0001; WT vs pcrg-1 = 0.0001; WT vs cfap-20;pcrg-1 = 0.0001; WT vs che-11 = 0.0001; cfap-20 vs pcrg-1 = 0.4094; cfap-20 vs cfap-20;pcrg-1 = 0.0001; cfap-20 vs che-11 = 0.0001; pcrg-1 vs cfap-20;pcrg-1 = 0.0001; pcrg-1 vs. che-11 = 0.0001; cfap-20;pcrg-1 vs che-11 = 0.0001). The body lengths of staged animals were measured at young adulthood (72 h). All box plots represent minima, 25th percentile, median, 75th percentile, maxima Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Nat. Commun.