ZFIN Image: Della Vecchia et al., 2022, Fig. 8

Image

Figure Caption

Fig. 8

Locomotor, LFP and burst activity recordings after trehalose administration. (A) Locomotion analysis at five dpf in controls (WT) treated (n = 172) and untreated with trehalose (n = 193) and in epm2a^−/− mutant larvae treated (n = 213) and untreated with trehalose (n = 228). Statistical analysis (**** p ≤ 0.0001) was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Dunn’s test was used to perform post-hoc analysis for multiple comparisons after the Kruskal-Wallis test. (B) Tail flick analysis performed at 30 hpf in controls (WT) treated (n = 91) and untreated with trehalose (n = 87) as well as in epm2a^−/− mutant larvae treated (n = 106) and untreated with trehalose (n = 111). Statistical analysis (**** p ≤ 0.0001) was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Dunn’s test was used to perform post-hoc analysis for multiple comparisons after the Kruskal-Wallis test. ns, not significant (C) Violin plot of the effect of trehalose on the power and duration of detected events, 11 larvae per group were analyzed at five dpf. Statistical analysis (**** p ≤ 0.0001) was performed using the Mann-Whitney test.

Figure Data

Phenotype details

Acknowledgments

This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Int. J. Mol. Sci.