IMAGE

Fig. S1

ID
ZDB-IMAGE-170303-8
Source
Figures for Kuri et al., 2017
Image
Figure Caption

Fig. S1

Comparison between Tg(8xHs.NFκB:GFP,Luciferase) and two other previously developed zebrafish NF-κB-responsive transgenic lines. (A) Tg(NFκB:EGFP) embryos display stronger GFP signal in the skin compared to the Tg(8xHs.NFκB:GFP,Luciferase) embryos at 3dpf. Note the Tg(NFκB:EGFP) line was originally described in Kanther et al., 2011. (B) Comparison between Tg(8xHs.NFκB:GFP,Luciferase) and Tg(NFκB-EGFP) after tailfin cut. The GFP was examined 40 hours post-injury (hpi). Note equal laser intensity was used to illustrate that Tg(NFκB-EGFP) embryos display weaker GFP signal in the injured site compared to the Tg(8xHs.NFκB:GFP,Luciferase) embryos. Yellow arrows indicate cells with GFP expression. Note Tg(NFκB-EGFP) line was originally described in Banerjee and Leptin, 2014. Anterior is to the left. Scale bars: 200μm (A) and 30μm (B).

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ J. Cell Sci.